Organizational Transformation

Is real organizational transformation possible in today’s regulated healthcare environment? The simple answer is – Yes. There are many health-related organizational exemplars (e.g., Mayo Clinic, Cleveland Clinic, Kaiser Permanente). These were perhaps transformative from their beginning. The complications begin when one asks about transforming a traditional operation – How do we contextualize and propagate transformation at the system, organizational and individual level? And, what roles will design play?

System-wide transformation, commonly referred to as reform in the health sector, is messy business – just look at the current health ‘dialogue’ in the US (or reflect upon any attempt at health reform in any jurisdiction). Perhaps we might agree that the first challenge for health reform is deciding upon a future state. Then we must ask, who’s “we” and “how do we decide on that ideal state?” There is no single future state that will satisfy all stakeholders, so each stakeholder group attempts to imprint their vision and needs upon the emerging target state. The next hurdle is enacting supporting legislation. The same stakeholder influences that impacted the future state exercise are magnified during the legislative and implementation processes. The extended timeframe over which these activities transpire creates a sustained climate of uncertainty and takes a high emotional toll on all stakeholders, especially those directly impacted – patients and health professionals.


Organizational transformation depends upon creating a climate – persistent patterns of attitude, feelings, and behaviors – that reinforces the value and benefits of knowledge sharing, teamwork and innovation and positively influences the culture of the organization – its collective symbols, beliefs and commitments – and ultimately, its practices. In a networked, knowledge based, interdisciplinary, interdependent, client-centered environment, the old organizational structures and processes are no longer effective or efficient.


Individual transformation requires one to change one’s professional identity and practices in a manner that compliments system, organization and client demands.


The question for each of us is - How can design be used to positively influence organizational transformation?

Comment

You need to be a member of Design for Care to add comments!

Join Design for Care

Peter Jones Comment by Peter Jones on August 18, 2009 at 12:20pm
Thanks Peter - let me note that Peter West set up this Forum, and for some odd reason Ning does not show his avatar or name. It will show you once you respond, so I'll respond in kind to your question.

I generally agree with your presentation of the "levels of transformation." We (designers) often jump right into system transformation, because it lures us with promise of solving root causes in systemic problems. But what if many of the root causes of systemic problems were personal and individual? Yes, perhaps, it appears futile to address the individual awareness of the participants in a complex system. But it is precisely because we usually ignore personal transformation that it may be so potent when realized in an organizational setting.

If the strategic question is 'How design might positively influence organizations" we must start by inquiring into our own stake-holding and personal vision for that organization. The opportunities, impact and limits of transformation reflect not our judgment of what's possible, but instead show up within the range of possibilities we can envision as possible. What we envision as possible owes more to this sense of how we personally own and live into a vision for the organization than our knowledge and experiences from the past.

© 2012   Created by Peter Jones.

Badges  |  Report an Issue  |  Terms of Service